








Jerusalem-forum@wanadoo.jo

|
|
Gideon Levy: A questionable death
Haaretz
12 August, 2007
The taxi to Bethlehem was delayed, and Jihad stood at the
dusty taxi stand and waited. He was on his way to the Open
University in Bethlehem, to register for the upcoming school
year. His father says that he hadn't decided what he wanted to
study. Maybe that's what he was thinking about while he stood at
the stand, exposed to the burning sun.
And what was going through the heads of the soldiers who
beat him mercilessly, with a club, with the butt of a rifle and
with kicks to his head, so that he died? Is it possible that he
tried to attack them with a knife, even though two eyewitnesses
didn't see it? Even if he did, why did the soldiers continue to
beat him, even after he lay on the ground, unconscious and
perhaps bound as well, as an eyewitness told us? And what kind
of monstrous behavior is it to handcuff the bereaved father, and
then leave him on the ground, in front of the body of his beaten
and dying son? Above all, why did the Israel Defense Forces rush
to dismiss this grave incident, "after an initial
investigation," during which nobody interrogated the
eyewitnesses, with the conclusion, "the soldiers acted
properly"?
Pictures of Jihad Shaar's death flicker on the computer
screen: The battered and calm face of a young man with three
holes in his skull, in front and in back. Also a picture of the
bereaved father, Khalil, a worker in a Bethlehem factory that
manufactures olive-wood souvenirs, his hands bound behind his
back, kneeling on the floor, his face radiating restrained pain
and humiliation, and the soldier standing next to him with a
drawn weapon - everything is documented on the computer screen.
The stone houses stand at the edge of the desert, in the village
of Tekoa, on a mountainside opposite the archaeological site of
Herodion and the Jewish settlement also called Tekoa. The area
is usually quiet, with the exception of the annoying IDF
patrols.
Khalil, with bristles of mourning on his face, is a gentle
and quiet man. They say that his son was like that, too. The day
after the incident, the Israeli press asserted that Jihad was
mentally unstable, perhaps even disabled. It's all a
fabrication. Last year Jihad studied hard to improve his
matriculation exam grades and now he was supposed to register
for the Bethlehem branch of the Al-Quds Open University.
On Friday, July 27, the family awoke as usual, the mother
of the family went for a family visit and Jihad planned to
travel to the university. Nothing in the house testified to what
was to take place a short time later. Jihad, like the rest of
his family, had never been arrested.
At 9:30 A.M., Jihad left the house and walked the several
hundred meters to the taxi stand near the road to Bethlehem. His
father, who was at home, says that Jihad took nothing with him.
But the armored Hummer was already standing at the side of the
road, several dozen meters from the taxi stand. There is almost
always a Hummer standing there, a kind of surprise roadblock for
the village's residents, where soldiers check papers, harass and
humiliate, and maintain proper order on the road.
As Jihad stood alone at the stand, the soldiers apparently
called him to approach them. A Palestinian policeman, Musa
Suleiman, was riding to Bethlehem at the time in a taxi that was
approaching the stand. Suleiman saw Jihad walking "with ordinary
steps, in a manner that did not arouse any suspicion," toward
the soldiers. He says that Jihad had nothing in his hands.
One soldier stood next to the driver's door of the Hummer,
and another three soldiers sat inside. When Jihad reached the
Hummer, Suleiman says he saw the soldier grab Jihad by the shirt
and pull him forcibly behind the vehicle. Suleiman, who was
already about 20 meters from the vehicle, says that apparently
an argument broke out between Jihad and the soldier who grabbed
his shirt, which developed into a violent struggle between the
two. A few seconds later he saw them both sprawled on the
ground.
That's when the other three soldiers got out of the Hummer.
Suleiman heard two shots. The four soldiers, according to
Suleiman, began beating Jihad, who was sprawled on the ground.
They used wooden clubs and their rifle butts, while Jihad tried
to protect his head with his hands. That was all Suleiman saw,
because the taxi, which was traveling slowly, then passed the
Hummer.
When the taxi was a few dozen meters away from the area of
the beatings, it drove back to see what was happening behind the
Hummer. Suleiman says that the soldiers continued to beat Jihad.
He saw the club land on Jihad's head at least twice. "I felt
that these were fatal beatings," says the policeman Suleiman. He
says that Jihad was no longer moving. Suleiman rushed to Jihad's
house to alert his father: "Come quickly, the soldiers are
beating your son." Accompanied by Suleiman, he rushed in the
direction of the stand.
When they approached the area, the soldiers aimed their
weapons at them and ordered them to leave. One of the villagers
who speaks Hebrew, who also arrived at the spot, tried to
explain to the soldiers that Khalil was the father of the
battered young man, and all he wanted was to know what had
happened to his son. And then the soldier said: "Tell him that
his son is already dead."
Then the soldiers handcuffed Khalil behind his back, and
placed him on the road, the Hummer separating him from his son's
body, while they chased the other two men away from the site.
Meanwhile additional forces arrived, together with a military
ambulance, whose squad apparently tried to save Jihad's life.
After about 40 minutes during which he sat handcuffed in the
sun, says Khalil, an officer from the Civil Administration,
Taysir, arrived and ordered the soldiers to free the father from
his handcuffs and told him that his son had been sent to the
hospital in nearby Beit Jala.
The officer from the Civil Administration asked Khalil:
"Why did your son do that?" The father: "My son was on the way
to the university." The officer: "Your son made problems for the
soldiers and pulled out a kitchen knife." Khalil to the officer:
"My son did not leave the house with a knife. Show me the knife,
I'm familiar with the knives in our kitchen."
"You want to see the knife?" asked the officer, who then
immediately retracted his offer: "The Military Police have
already removed the knife from the site." Khalil didn't see the
knife.
Taysir told Khalil that Jihad was seriously wounded. Khalil
called his brother and together they drove quickly toward the
hospital. On the way they were delayed again, in the same place
where his son was killed. Only after about 10 minutes were they
allowed to continue, after the intercession of one of the
soldiers who had seen Khalil in the area earlier and recognized
him.
Jihad had been evacuated from the site at about 11:15. A
short time later his father arrived at the hospital. But his
son's body reached Beit Jala only at about 3 P.M. The officer
from the Civil Administration had told the father that his son
was "seriously wounded," but the soldier had told him even
earlier that Jihad had died, and therefore Khalil had no hope of
seeing his son alive again. He talks about everything in an
amazing tone of acceptance and restraint.
When the body arrived at the hospital the doctors examined
it. They determined that Jihad had not been shot, he had been
beaten to death. They discovered the three superficial holes in
his head and several bruises in other parts of his body, mainly
around the hips. The body was sent for an autopsy in Abu Dis,
and afterward was brought for burial; the funeral was well
attended. Several residents of the village say that when they
began to dig the grave, a Border Patrol Hummer arrived at the
village and its passengers called out in Arabic on a
loudspeaker: "Jihad is dead. Let Allah have mercy on him and
your mother's c - - -."
The IDF spokesman, this week: "On July 26, in the course of
operational activity by an IDF patrol near the village of Hirbet
al-Dir, east of Bethlehem, a Palestinian armed with a knife
approached the patrol and tried to attack one of the soldiers.
In response, the soldier fired at the terrorist and hit his
lower body. After the Palestinian continued with his attempts to
stab the soldier, another soldier who was present was forced to
use a club in order to neutralize the terrorist. The Palestinian
terrorist, who was seriously wounded, was given medical
treatment on the spot by an IDF force and in the end he was
declared dead."
A few cypress trees are planted on the slope at the foot of
the place where Jihad was killed. Some faded bloodstains are
still visible on the ground. The taxi stand is deserted. A
Hummer observes us from the hill overlooking the road. We ascend
the hill, passing the armored Hummer whose passengers, four
soldiers in dark sunglasses, are laughing among themselves. Are
these the soldiers who killed Jihad. Are they from the same
unit?
In the handsome stone house with beehives in the yard,
which overlooks the taxi stand and the site of the killing,
lives another eyewitness, Nur Harmas. On the day of the incident
she awoke to the sound of the Hummer's engine below. Harmas says
that she noticed a young man at the stand, waiting. She went
inside and began to do her housework. After about 15 minutes she
heard a dull noise. She cast a glance from the window and saw
the stand empty. Jihad was no longer standing there. A cypress
hides the place where the Hummer stood.
Harmas rushed to her bedroom, opened the door that leads to
the balcony, from which one can see the place where the Hummer
stood. "I saw the deceased lying on the ground, his hands
handcuffed behind his back, with three soldiers standing around
him, one of them kicking his head. The moment I saw that, I
rushed to the neighbors to call for help." She told her
husband's cousin, who quickly went down to see what they were
doing to Jihad.
Karim Jubran, an investigator from B'Tselem (the Israeli
Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied
Territories), takes out of his briefcase a pair of torn, white
plastic handcuffs, which he found at the site of the incident.
Was Jihad also handcuffed at the time when the soldiers beat him
to death? Or are these the handcuffs with which the soldiers
handcuffed the bereaved father, in front of his son's body? Does
it make a difference?
|