|
|
|
|||
|
Hundreds converge on Ramallah for boycott summit Summary report, Conference Steering Committee, 29 November 2007 November 29, 2007
The conference was opened by Dr. Gabi Baramki (Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel-PACBI) who reminded participants of the fact that boycott has been a tool of the Palestinian struggle since the 1920s. He stated that the power of popular boycott derived from international law and universal ethical principles, and emphasized the timeliness of a Palestinian popular boycott movement, especially now, when isolation and fragmentation are imposed more than ever on the Palestinian people, in order to bring about loss of hope, dignity and surrender. Boycott and popular struggle contributed to the liberation of India and South Africa, he stated, adding that, while it is true that the challenge for Palestinians is bigger, because South Africa never enjoyed the level of support Israel has from the United States and Europe, the Palestinian boycott campaign can be effective because of Israel's ultimate dependence, politically, diplomatically and economically, on the West. Representing the Palestinian Non-Governemntal Organizations Network, Dr. Allam Jarrar then summarized the need for boycott in the current political context, asserting that "The Palestinian struggle is a struggle against the systematic effort by Israel to replace one people in the country by another." He affirmed that the conference was a historic event "because 60 years into the Palestinian Nakba, we are beginning to revise the strategy of our struggle for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them our rights to self-determination, independence and return [for refugees]. The boycott campaign will re-vitalize popular resistance and restore dignity." He presented several motivating factors for the BDS campaign: it dispels the myth that negotiations with Israel are the only form of struggle that Palestinians can engage in; as a nonviolent tool, it is a form of popular resistance that can appeal to all Palestinians, in the homeland and exile, as well as to global supporters; it is a tool for rebuilding collective struggle and unity; it revives national culture and identity, and can give hope and inspiration to the young generation; and it challenges the current balance of power through applying sustained and effective pressure on Israel. The first session included presentations -- followed by discussion -- by two guest speakers. Virginia Setshedi, from the Palestine Solidarity Committee in South Africa, reminded the audience that apartheid is a crime against humanity, and explained that the new, post-apartheid South African social movement understands the struggle of the Palestinian people. At the time of the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, a commitment was made to support the Palestinian struggle to isolate apartheid Israel, she said. The social movement in South Africa, which welcomed the 2005 Palestinian civil society BDS call as an appeal by the Palestinian people to launch this joint struggle, has worked ever since on building the BDS movement in South Africa -- shaming the South African government and pressuring it to rescind normal relations with Israel, and boycotting Israeli consumer products. She emphasized the importance of solidarity to be mutual and encouraged Palestinians to express their support for the people's struggle in post-apartheid South Africa for economic and social justice. Prof. Haim Bresheeth, of the British Committee for Universities of Palestine, gave a personal account of how a state visit to Israel in 1972 by the prime minister of the South African regime made him aware of the affinity between apartheid and Israel's Zionist regime. He emphasized the need for a profound analysis not only of Zionist Israel's strengths, but also of the failures of Israel's regime, as a system that can cause massive destruction but is unable to provide solutions to Jews, to the Palestinian people, or to the people in the region. Speakers in the second session set the agenda for the subsequent discussions in the workshops, examining how to promote boycott as a key component in the struggle by all sectors of Palestinian civil society and the criteria, programs and mechanisms needed to guide the Palestinian and global boycott campaign. Based on a review of joint Israeli-Palestinian civil society projects ("people to people" projects) in the fields of gender, youth and efforts at "building a joint historical narrative," Dr. Islah Jad of PACBI showed how such projects have undermined Palestinian identity and struggle for freedom by giving the false impression of "balance" and of the possibility of reaching a "middle-ground" between the oppressor and the oppressed, rather than ending oppression altogether. As western donors continue to encourage such projects, she said, every Palestinian is responsible to undertake, before engagement, a close examination based on the criteria developed by the BDS campaign.
Adnan Ateyah, speaking for the
Occupied Palestine and Syrian Golan Heights Advocacy Initiative,
explained the criteria for the BDS campaign and emphasized the
strategic character of this campaign which aims not only to end
the military occupation in place since 1967, but also to
challenge Israel's ideology, Zionism, and its international
relations. Jamal Jum'a of the Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign
pointed out that boycott is an effective tool in supporting
Palestinian farmers and the building of a Palestinian economy of
steadfastness on the land as opposed to grandiose "development
projects" that effectively entrench dependency on the
occupation. He stressed the need to unify the political
analysis, terminology and campaigns, and to promote the BDS
campaign at a national level. Opposition to normalization has to
be a crucial element of the campaign, he stated, in order to
strengthen Palestinian cohesion and give a signal to the people
and the leadership. Globally, Jum'a added, the BDS movement has
become today so widespread and diversified that it is beyond the
capacity of the Zionist lobby to destroy it; only Palestinian
normalization can do so.
|