|
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
should be put forward as a document serving as a prime
witness to the war crimes and the crimes against humanity of
the destruction of Palestinian society and cultural
geography.
By Jim Miles
PalestineChronicle.com
The
Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Ilan Pappe. Oneworld
Publications, Oxford, England, 2006.
Ilan Pappe’s
work The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine places him in the
forefront of the recent burst of excellent information that
critically examines and condemns the Jewish-Zionist actions
to eliminate not only the people of Palestine but also to
eliminate their history culturally and geographically.
Following on his previous well researched and readily
accessible work A History of Modern Palestine, his latest
work, focuses on the concept generated from the very
earliest Zionist thought in the Nineteenth century, making
the ‘cleansing’ of Palestinian territories a necessity for
the survival of the Jewish state.
It is a
history made personal. Pappe does not just recount the
series of events, and the sequence they occurred in but
makes the story become real through the views of Israeli
individuals and the views of individual Palestinians.
Israel has hidden its war criminals well, out in the open,
blatant, the clear majority of their political leaders
having served in the military in one capacity or another to
facilitate the ‘cleansing’ of their desired state. Using
archival references from various Israeli sources as well as
the personal diaries of those involved, in particular David
Ben-Gurion, a personal encounter with the perpetrators of
the genocide is created. That encounter displays a
strong-willed double standard that accepted no interference
with the ultimate goal of Eretz Israel for Jews only.
It is a
history made personal on the Palestinian side, with stories
in photos and anecdotes from the dispossessed population,
stories of their life style before their evictions or murder
and stories of the cultural geography of the many towns and
villages that have been erased from both the physical and
cultural geography of the larger area.
The Jewish
account is the false front expressed through the media, the
story of a rugged band of individuals bringing greenness and
fruition to a barren and desert land. It denies fully the
pastoral and passive lifestyle of the Palestinian people who
lived in many towns and villages surrounded with productive
croplands and orchards. It denies the increasing wealth and
modernization of the area that followed the conclusion of
the Second World War, with many ‘modern’ civic
infrastructures being brought forward to the Palestinian
people. It denies the cultural achievements of the area,
the particular forms of landholding and agriculture that
developed and were sustainable under varying conditions.
Ethnic
cleansing is defined clearly and simply as “the expulsion by
force in order to homogenise the ethnically mixed population
of a particular region or territory.” This definition is
widely accepted across many incidents outside of Palestine
and as such is recognized as well as a crime against
humanity. Pappe writes “with a deep conviction” that this
crime should “become rooted in our memory and consciousness”
while at the same time being “excluded from the list of
alleged crimes.”[italics in original] What the world has
been presented with creates a “deep chasm between reality
and representation”, an attempted forced amnesia about the
actions taken by Jewish forces against the Palestinian
population.
Prior to the
‘war of independence’ many factors had already played into
the hands of the Jewish minority. The main feature was the
British tacit and complicit support for the creation of the
new Jewish state, not surprisingly as the Balfour
Declaration had set the stage many years previously.
Militarily, the British assisted with the training of the
Haganah, the ‘defence’ force of the Jewish community both
within Palestine and by providing valuable experience during
the Second World War. During the 1936 revolt, “the British
had already destroyed the Palestinian leadership and its
defence capabilities.” During the first moments of the war,
the British stood aside and allowed the Jewish forces to
begin the ethnic cleansing, in some instances assisting
actively in the process.
The UN played
into the Jewish plan as well, with its lopsided proposed
partitioning of Palestine giving the larger Palestinian
population the minor portion of the land. From the
Palestinian perspective they “were at the mercy of an
international organization that appeared ready to ignore all
the rules of international mediation”, declaring a solution
that “was both illegal and immoral.”
A third
factor that aided them greatly was the complicity and
tactics of the Jordanians who wished to expand their own
little empire in the making. While coveting the area of
greater Israel, “the Zionist leadership was committed to
their collusion with the Jordanians,” who apparently never
had much if any sympathy for the cause of Palestine. This
collusion had the effect of “ensuring the ethnic cleansing
operations” as it “neutralised the strongest army in the
Arab world.” Other Arab leaders provided much rhetoric but
little in the way of military support from their properly
enraged populace.
With an
estimated 50,000 well-trained and well-equipped military
force the cleansing began against what proved to be a
passive Palestinian population and a militarily inactive and
ineffective Arab defence force. The Palestinian villagers
showed “no wish to fight” and rural Palestine “showed no
desire to fight or attack, and was defenceless.” The Jewish
forces resorted to terror of various sorts – biological and
chemical weapons, murder, rape, and theft of personal
property.
From these
beginnings in quick order, Pappe details the various
elements of the ethnic cleansing. Villages are given life,
with brief accounts of their culture and uniqueness; the
people are given life with anecdotes about the savageness of
events overwhelming them; the Israeli forces are given life,
such as it was, in their barbaric actions and satisfaction
with the manner in which the cleansing progressed. After
the removal of the Palestinians, the ongoing destruction of
their heritage is described, the looting of the empty houses
and villages, the continued destruction of the housing and
infrastructure, the legalized theft of farmland and the
erasure of village sites. The over-riding purpose was to
“pre-empt the threat of international sanctions” that could
include the right of return, given that there was nowhere to
return to.
Not only was
the Palestinian culture physically destroyed, it was
replaced “with a fabricated version of another” culture,
supposedly the long history of Jewish settlement in the
region. The propaganda that the Jews were “making the
desert bloom” and were acting ecologically to “keep the
country green” was used effectively to mask the physical
destruction of the villages. Ironically, that process
relied somewhat on the native cultivation that had been
ongoing for centuries within the Palestinian agricultural
community.
Finally,
Pappe recognizes the various peace proposals and initiatives
as being means for avoiding any final settlement, allowing
the cleansing to continue under the guise of the settlement
policy that developed after the 1967 war. Further along,
the events of 9/11 allowed the Jewish state to identify the
population not as Palestinians but as Muslims and
terrorists. This created more antagonism towards them, at
the same time continuing the support of the local population
for the process of ‘removal’, a more recently used euphemism
for ethnic cleansing, but also a throwback to the original
Zionist plans of a century ago.
To recognize
their moral responsibility for the terror and illegality of
the ethnic cleansing perpetrated against the Palestinians
would require the Israelis to deny “their own status of
victimhood”, forcing them to recognize “they have become the
mirror image of their own worst nightmare.” A final
description of Israel as essentially a failed state, with
high social violence, a declining standard of living and a
reliance on American military and financial support, leads
to questions about the future. Unless Israel can stop its
Zionist inspired plan for complete ethnic cleansing and
accept a more pluralistic Judaism, then the risk of
escalating conflict in the region, from Lebanon through
Syria and Iran, is imminent.
The
recognition of the nakba, the disaster of ethnic cleansing,
is a necessary first step towards a successful resolution of
the conflict. Succinct, clearly written, sometimes
emotionally overwhelming in its personalized presentation,
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine should be put forward as a
document serving as a prime witness to the war crimes and
the crimes against humanity of the destruction of
Palestinian society and cultural geography by the Jewish
state.
Print this
Article
|