








Jerusalem-forum@wanadoo.jo

|
|
The Jordanian Option by Professor Dr. Ahmad Tell
Peace Proposals
The
“Jordanian option” is based upon the concept of settling the
Palestine Question in association with Jordan. Originally, the
idea was the Peel Commission of 1936 and by Count Folke
Bernadotte, the UN Mediator on Palestine in 1948. Bernadotte
mentioned in his report to the General Assembly of September 16,
1948 (A/648) the possibility of merging with Transjordan, in
full consultation with the Arab inhabitants of Palestine, the
territory of Palestine which was earmarked for the Arab State in
accordance with the UN partition Resolution. Israel’s seizure
and annexation of most of the area of Palestine in 1948 and
1949, including most of the territory earmarked for the Arab
State, prevented the pursuit of Count Bernadotte’s suggestion.
The idea of the merger of Jordanian and Palestinian territories
was carried out by King Abdullah of Jordan in 1950 when he
arranged a parliamentary vote for the unification of Transjordan
and Palestine upon the request of the Palestinian leaders of all
factions in the West Bank.
Israel’s
Jordanian Option
The
question arose again in 1967 after Israel had occupied the West
Bank and Gaza. The idea of settling the problem in association
with Jordan was revived, this time by Israel, in order to
resolve the issue, not with regard to the territory of Palestine
that was reserved for the Arab State under the Partition
Resolution as had been suggested by Count Bernadotte, but with
regard only to the West Bank and Gaza. Such a plan was
substantially based upon the political program of the Israeli
Labor Party.
The
motive is not generosity but is entirely selfish. If Israel were
to absorb the territories occupied in 1967 and their Arab
population of over a million and a half, the number of
Palestinians, added to Israel’s present Arab-citizen population
of 700,000, would comprise 40 per cent of Israel’s total
population. This would dilute the Jewishness of Israel and would
be in contradiction with the Zionist concept of a purely Jewish
State. Moreover, with the higher Arab birthrate, non-Jews could
within the foreseeable future become the majority of the
population. Hence, by effecting a so-called “compromise” over
the West Bank with Jordan under a peace treaty, Israel would
achieve several objectives: It would get rid of a large number
of Palestinians, obtain Arab ratification of its conquests, and
liquidate the Palestine Question.
The
above considerations, however, did not cause any concern to
Menachem Begin who rejected the Jordanian Option after becoming
Prime Minister of Israel in 1977. His policy was not to return
to the Arabs a single inch of the West Bank. The annexation of
the West Bank and Gaza, which he described as Judea and Samaria
of biblical times, was his paramount objective, which he sought
to achieve by the multiplication of Jewish settlements. The
problem posed by the number of Palestinians could be settled by
expulsion, apartheid (which is already in application) or, by
the grant of autonomy to the Palestinians in municipal affairs
in accordance with the Camp David formula. This has been the
policy of the Likud in contradiction to the Israeli Labor Party.
Jordan’s
Jordanian Option
A
somewhat different Jordanian option was adopted as Jordan’s
policy by King Hussein after the capture of the West Bank and
Gaza by Israel in 1967. In an attempt to counter Israeli efforts
to annex the occupied territories by the creation of
settlements, King Hussein proposed on March 15, 1972 the
unification of the west Bank and the east Bank of the Jordan in
a “United Arab Kingdom”. The proposal was rejected by the
Palestine Liberation Organization. Again on June 22, 1977,
Jordan revived the proposal and suggested a federation between
an autonomous West Bank of Palestine and an East Bank State of
Jordan. The proposal was again rejected by the PLO.
When
President Reagan offered his peace plan of Palestinian autonomy
in association with Jordan in 1982, King Hussein seized the
occasion to offer to the Palestinians a confederation between
the West Bank and Jordan. This assumed the future establishment
of a Palestinian State and was meant as a compromise between the
Fez and Reagan plans. King Hussein’s proposal was discussed by
the Palestine National Council at Algiers in February 1983. The
principle of a Palestinian-Jordanian confederation was approved,
but only on condition that each of the members of the federation
was established as an independent state.
Jordan-PLO agreement of February 11, 1985
At the
initiative of King Hussein of Jordan an agreement was reached on
February 11, 1985 between the government of Jordan and the PLO
on a joint initiative to promote a settlement of the
Arab-Israeli conflict on the basis of the UN resolutions and in
the context of a federation. The agreement provided for the
implementation of the following principles:
-
Total withdrawal by Israel from the territories it occupied
in 1967 in consideration of a comprehensive peace.
-
Right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, such
right to be exercised within the context of the proposed
confederated Arab States of Jordan and Palestine.
-
Solution of the Palestine refugee problem in accordance with
the UN resolutions.
-
Solution of the Question of Palestine in all its aspects.
-
Negotiations for the implementation of these principles
should be conducted by a joint Jordanian-Palestinian
delegation under the auspices of an international conference
including the five permanent members of the Security
Council.
The
joint peace initiative encountered a number of difficulties. The
US and Israel opposed the holding of negotiations with PLO
representatives and the holding of negotiations in the context
of an international conference. Regarding the composition of the
Jordanian-Palestinian delegation, the US and Israel claimed the
right to approve the Palestinian members. Moreover, a difference
also arose between Jordan and the PLO concerning the point
whether Security Council Resolution 242 would serve as the
guideline for the negotiations. King Hussein showed readiness to
accept resolution 242 while the PLO rejected it because it does
not guarantee the national rights of the people of Palestine.
Eventually, the plan for
a Jordanian-PLO joint peace initiative collapsed in February
1986 over disagreement between King Hussein and the PLO
regarding Security Council Resolution 242.
July 25, 1999
Professor Dr. Ahmad Tell, of Jordanian origin, is Dean of Zarka
Private National Community College in Zarka, Jordan. In 1980 he
received an Award of Distinction from the American Association
of Colleges for Teacher Education. He is the author of several
books and publications: Higher Education in Jordan ,
published in 1997, including Abdullah Tell, the Hero and
Why Did the Arabs Fail?, both of which are currently
under print. Dr.Tell also wrote a research paper about the
former Prime Minister Samir Rifai and the Palestinian cause in
1997.
Dr.Tell was an
officer in the Arab Legion from 1946-1950 and fought in the
Arab-Israeli War of 1948.
References:
Cattan, Henry. The Palestine Question. Croom Helm Ltd.,
London, New York, 1988.
|