|
Over
the last year ‘Breaking the Silence’ has collected testimonies given
by hundreds of IOF (Israeli Defense Forces) soldiers who served in
the territories during the last conflict. These testimonies reveal
the impossible reality those soldiers have to face, and the terrible
moral price this reality demands. Selected collections from those
testimonies have been published in testimonial collections produced
by ‘Breaking the Silence’.
The
present collection is not just one more testimonial-collection,
revealing the brutal routine of the territories’ reality, or the
constant moral degradation and erosion of soldiers’ values. The
collection focuses on IOF orders, rules of engagement and
operational procedures. It presents a grave picture of evidently
illegal orders given frequently, and in different times and places:
firing at civilians who pose no risk, revenge operations,
intentionally shooting at rescue-forces, and more. This collection
reveals the depth of the military administration’s moral corruption,
and the dimness of moral sense, which has spread to the highest
ranks. The testimonies in this collection concerns various units
that were operative in the territories in different times and at
different places, and is thus an evidence for the magnitude of the
moral decay, and for the depths to which flawed norms have diffused.
It
is also apparent that the IOF’s self-inspection system has failed to
fulfill its duty. This also applies to the civilian and
parliamentary inspection mechanisms, which, during the last
confrontations, have consistently refrained from criticizing the
army’s mode of conduct in general, and its rules of engagement in
particular. This brings out sharply an urgent need to create a
platform on which the information we have gathered here can be
presented, in order to examine what this information teaches, as
well as the IOF’s mode of conduct during the last confrontations. A
civilized and decent society cannot survive without a continuous
inspection and criticism of the most powerful organization operating
within it. ‘Breaking the Silence’ is therefore calling for the
establishment of an independent public inspection committee, which
will enable a responsible disclosure and examination of the facts.
Listening and taking responsibility is the very least that is
required of society and its representatives in a civilized and
decent society founded on basic moral values.
Targeting the Children
The witness:
1st Sergeant, Paratroops
The Location:
Jenin
Date:
February-May 2003
Description:
We
took up positions of ‘Straw Widow’ (a disguised ambush). We were
told that this ‘Straw Widow’ was against armed people and against
people climbing on our armed vehicles. Our APCs (armed personnel
carriers) were cruising 24 hours a day close to buildings (in Jenin),
waiting for kids to climb on them, trying to dislodge the top
-mounted MG (machine gun) and to shoot them. We had fixed positions
inside Jenin’s casbah, the APCs were on the streets, below us. They
were moving continuously. We were expressly told that we were just
waiting for someone to climb on an APC, and ordered to shoot to
kill. We quickly understood that we weren’t expected to deal with
armed people as no armed Palestinian would roam the streets with so
many APCs around. They (our authorities) were looking for children
or plain people daring to climb on an APC or on any other armored
vehicle. We understood that from the talks with our officers.
After
a day or two, a 12-year old kid climbed on one of the APCs. There
were lots of guesses about his age. First they said he was 8, later,
that he was 12. I don’t know. In any case he climbed on an APC and
one of our sharpshooters killed him. I already mentioned, we were
looking for kids. The neighboring company also had an incident with
a kid or teenager, climbing an APC, who was also killed. Some of us
said that this whole operation was unnecessary as its purpose was to
kill kids, while others said that it was very good.
Was it known that he was unarmed?
He
was surely unarmed and he climbed on this…. No one asked you why you
had two Xs (a mark on the rifle signaling a
killed target), and if they were armed, they were legit targets.
|