|
Israeli report: "Shocking" tales of violence by soldiers
The Guardian
October 25, 2007
A study by an Israeli psychologist into the violent behaviour of
the country's soldiers is provoking bitter controversy and has
awakened urgent questions about the way the army conducts itself
in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.
Nufar Yishai-Karin, a clinical psychologist at the Hebrew
University in Jerusalem, interviewed 21 Israeli soldiers and
heard confessions of frequent brutal assaults against
Palestinians, aggravated by poor training and discipline. In her
recently published report, co-authored by Professor Yoel Elizur,
Yishai-Karin details a series of violent incidents, including
the beating of a four-year-old boy by an officer.
The report, although dealing with the experience of soldiers in
the 1990s, has triggered an impassioned debate in Israel, where
it was published in an abbreviated form in the newspaper Haaretz
last month. According to Yishai Karin: 'At one point or another
of their service, the majority of the interviewees enjoyed
violence. They enjoyed the violence because it broke the routine
and they liked the destruction and the chaos. They also enjoyed
the feeling of power in the violence and the sense of danger.'
In the words of one soldier: 'The truth? When there is chaos, I
like it. That's when I enjoy it. It's like a drug. If I don't go
into Rafah, and if there isn't some kind of riot once in some
weeks, I go nuts.'
Another explained: 'The most important thing is that it removes
the burden of the law from you. You feel that you are the law.
You are the law. You are the one who decides... As though from
the moment you leave the place that is called Eretz Yisrael [the
Land of Israel] and go through the Erez checkpoint into the Gaza
Strip, you are the law. You are God.'
The soldiers described dozens of incidents of extreme violence.
One recalled an incident when a Palestinian was shot for no
reason and left on the street. 'We were in a weapons carrier
when this guy, around 25, passed by in the street and, just like
that, for no reason - he didn't throw a stone, did nothing -
bang, a bullet in the stomach, he shot him in the stomach and
the guy is dying on the pavement and we keep going, apathetic.
No one gave him a second look,' he said
The soldiers developed a mentality in which they would use
physical violence to deter Palestinians from abusing them. One
described beating women. 'With women I have no problem. With
women, one threw a clog at me and I kicked her here [pointing to
the crotch], I broke everything there. She can't have children.
Next time she won't throw clogs at me. When one of them [a
woman] spat at me, I gave her the rifle butt in the face. She
doesn't have what to spit with any more.'
Yishai-Karin found that the soldiers were exposed to violence
against Palestinians from as early as their first weeks of basic
training. On one occasion, the soldiers were escorting some
arrested Palestinians. The arrested men were made to sit on the
floor of the bus. They had been taken from their beds and were
barely clothed, even though the temperature was below zero. The
new recruits trampled on the Palestinians and then proceeded to
beat them for the whole of the journey. They opened the bus
windows and poured water on the arrested men.
The disclosure of the report in the Israeli media has occasioned
a remarkable response. In letters responding to the
recollections, writers have focused on both the present and past
experience of Israeli soldiers to ask troubling questions that
have probed the legitimacy of the actions of the Israeli Defence
Forces.
The study and the reactions to it have marked a sharp change in
the way Israelis regard their period of military service -
particularly in the occupied territories - which has been
reflected in the increasing levels of conscientious objection
and draft-dodging.
The debate has contrasted sharply with an Israeli army where new
recruits are taught that they are joining 'the most ethical army
in the world' - a refrain that is echoed throughout Israeli
society. In its doctrine, published on its website, the Israeli
army emphasises human dignity. 'The Israeli army and its
soldiers are obligated to protect human dignity. Every human
being is of value regardless of his or her origin, religion,
nationality, gender, status or position.'
However, the Israeli army, like other armies, has found it
difficult to maintain these values beyond the classroom. The
first intifada, which began in 1987, before the wave of suicide
bombings, was markedly different to the violence of the second
intifada, and its main events were popular demonstrations with
stone-throwing.
Yishai-Karin, in an interview with Haaretz, described how her
research came out of her own experience as a soldier at an army
base in Rafah in the Gaza Strip. She interviewed 18 ordinary
soldiers and three officers whom she had served with in Gaza.
The soldiers described how the violence was encouraged by some
commanders. One soldier recalled: 'After two months in Rafah, a
[new] commanding officer arrived... So we do a first patrol with
him. It's 6am, Rafah is under curfew, there isn't so much as a
dog in the streets. Only a little boy of four playing in the
sand. He is building a castle in his yard. He [the officer]
suddenly starts running and we all run with him. He was from the
combat engineers.
'He grabbed the boy. I am a degenerate if I am not telling you
the truth. He broke his hand here at the wrist, broke his leg
here. And started to stomp on his stomach, three times, and
left. We are all there, jaws dropping, looking at him in
shock...
'The next day I go out with him on another patrol, and the
soldiers are already starting to do the same thing."
Yishai-Karin concluded that the main reason for the soldiers'
violence was a lack of training. She found that the soldiers did
not know what was expected of them and therefore were free to
develop their own way of behaviour. The longer a unit was left
in the field, the more violent it became. The Israeli soldiers,
she concluded, had a level of violence which is universal across
all nations and cultures. If they are allowed to operate in
difficult circumstances, such as in Gaza and the West Bank,
without training and proper supervision, the violence is bound
to come out.
A spokeswoman for the Israeli army said that, if a soldier
deviates from the army's norms, they could be investigated by
the military police or face criminal investigation.
She said: 'It should be noted that since the events described in
Nufar Yishai-Karin's research the number of ethical violations
by Israeli soldiers involving the Palestinian population has
consistently dropped. This trend has continued in the last few
years.'
- The Guardian, Oct 21, 2007 – www.guardian.co.uk
|